<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Owner occupants get first shot at Fannie Mae foreclosures under &#8216;First Look&#8217; initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realestateconsumernews.com/home-sellers/owner-occupants-get-first-shot-at-fannie-mae-foreclosures-under-first-look-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realestateconsumernews.com/home-sellers/owner-occupants-get-first-shot-at-fannie-mae-foreclosures-under-first-look-initiative/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Consumer News is a one stop source for consumers to get the information they want and need concerning real estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 06:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ways to improve your search engine optimization</title>
		<link>http://realestateconsumernews.com/home-sellers/owner-occupants-get-first-shot-at-fannie-mae-foreclosures-under-first-look-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-7327</link>
		<dc:creator>ways to improve your search engine optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestateconsumernews.com/?p=1905#comment-7327</guid>
		<description>My spouse and i got now thankful  Raymond could carry out his analysis via the ideas he received from your own web site. It&#039;s not at all simplistic just to choose to be giving out guides which some people may have been making money from. We keep in mind we&#039;ve got the blog owner to appreciate for this. All the explanations you&#039;ve made, the straightforward web site menu, the relationships you help create - it&#039;s got all fantastic, and it is assisting our son and the family know that the content is enjoyable, and that is truly indispensable. Many thanks for the whole thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My spouse and i got now thankful  Raymond could carry out his analysis via the ideas he received from your own web site. It&#8217;s not at all simplistic just to choose to be giving out guides which some people may have been making money from. We keep in mind we&#8217;ve got the blog owner to appreciate for this. All the explanations you&#8217;ve made, the straightforward web site menu, the relationships you help create &#8211; it&#8217;s got all fantastic, and it is assisting our son and the family know that the content is enjoyable, and that is truly indispensable. Many thanks for the whole thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Norman</title>
		<link>http://realestateconsumernews.com/home-sellers/owner-occupants-get-first-shot-at-fannie-mae-foreclosures-under-first-look-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestateconsumernews.com/?p=1905#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>Diana,
I&#039;m an not an attorney and this is not legal advice, but from a practical standpoint, I would think that whatever home you and your family spend 50% or more of your time at, have your cars registered at, use as a mailing address, etc, would be your primary residence....From what you described it doesn&#039;t sound like this would qualify...I would suggest to describe your living situation in writing to the seller (Fannie Mae) and let them decide if you meet their requirement or not....Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana,<br />
I&#8217;m an not an attorney and this is not legal advice, but from a practical standpoint, I would think that whatever home you and your family spend 50% or more of your time at, have your cars registered at, use as a mailing address, etc, would be your primary residence&#8230;.From what you described it doesn&#8217;t sound like this would qualify&#8230;I would suggest to describe your living situation in writing to the seller (Fannie Mae) and let them decide if you meet their requirement or not&#8230;.Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://realestateconsumernews.com/home-sellers/owner-occupants-get-first-shot-at-fannie-mae-foreclosures-under-first-look-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 07:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestateconsumernews.com/?p=1905#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>We made an offer on a homepath first look property with 10% down on the advice of our broker because I live in the state with the property, but my husband telecommutes, and his company is in another state.  He lives there some of the time, and here some of the time, so we were told this must be our second home.  The Fannie Mae website says &quot;owner occupied&quot; for eligibility, but our counter offer that we must answer today says it must be our &quot;primary residence.&quot;  Are we eligible? How should we answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We made an offer on a homepath first look property with 10% down on the advice of our broker because I live in the state with the property, but my husband telecommutes, and his company is in another state.  He lives there some of the time, and here some of the time, so we were told this must be our second home.  The Fannie Mae website says &#8220;owner occupied&#8221; for eligibility, but our counter offer that we must answer today says it must be our &#8220;primary residence.&#8221;  Are we eligible? How should we answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

